Yes, I know this, that's why I suggested it. :) Of course, if it turns out that the issues are not confidential then sharing them on the public list is preferred.
Doug On 09/04/2012 06:13 AM, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > Security@ is an alias for secteam (to avoid accidentally leaking > confidential reports). > > -- > Simon L. B. Nielsen > Via mobile - sorry about the top posting > > On 4 Sep 2012 13:29, "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Doug Barton <[email protected]> writes: > > Please do ... probably security@ is the right forum for that. Sooner > > than later if you think that it affects the rc.d related discussion. > > Note that unlike other FreeBSD mailing lists, where foo@ is an alias > freebsd-foo@, security@ is not an alias for freebsd-security@, but > rather for either secteam@ or so@ (I forget which). > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
