On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:43:06PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > I think in most cases if devfs mount fails you will likely not end up > with a jail where you can do much... rather many things expect /dev/null > etc. > > It is possible to just disable the devfs mount completely for a jail if > you want the jail to start up anyway without devfs so I think it would > be OK to simply skip the jail if we cannot mount devfs - and complain > loudly. > > Anybody have any cases where this would be a problem? Just curious. Why devfs mounts can fail ?
pgpyzlNiuLWdi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
