On 24 December 2011 12:30, Maxim Ignatenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR conf/163508; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Maxim Ignatenko <[email protected]>
> To: Doug Barton <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: conf/163508: [rc.subr] [patch] Add &quot;enable&quot; and
>  &quot;disable&quot; commands to rc.subr
> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:20:19 +0200
>
>  On 24 December 2011 04:15, Doug Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > This idea has been considered before and rejected because it's too
>  > difficult to catch all the corner cases, and actually editing a config
>  > file is not really all that hard of a thing to do.
>  >
>
>  The idea was to make enabling/disabling services less error-prone. It
>  don't need to catch _all_ corner cases, because if administrator do
>  something unusual with startup configuration he should be able to
>  manipulate it in proper way, or even have tools that do something
>  similar.
>  Proposed patch handles /etc/rc.conf, /etc/rc.conf.local and
>  /etc/rc.conf.d/* properly (I hope), so it should fit nicely in 95% of
>  cases.
>  Doing `service someserive enable` is much faster and less error-prone
>  that `service someservice rcvar ; echo someservicercvar_enable=YES >>
>  /etc/rc.conf`

Disagree, sorry.

If we're going to implement these ideas we should do it properly, not
for 95% of cases.

Chris
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to