-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/18/11 12:50, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Garrett, good day. > > Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:42:27PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Xin LI <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Is there any counter reasoning about "having an interface >>> marked as non-DHCP is not an error"? I'm still not convinced >>> with the benefit of having it show an error message. >> >> +1. I consider this to be debug noise. > > Well, what about the silent output from 'cc -o test test.c' when > you have no file test.c or the compiler is absent? It is the same > thing (as I see it) and in this case will you expect that the > binary 'test' will be compiled and ready for use or not? I will, > but this can be my personal delusion.
I don't think this is a valid argument to my reasoning... In this specific case, having test.c absent is an error, while in the rc.d/dhclient case, having an interface without DHCP configuration is a perfectly fine one, and worked fine in the past... Cheers, - -- Xin LI <[email protected]> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOxscYAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBxDUIAJrIMkkekSqOEoAyFT9u3FvC hi9D7Ivrr7lTDHs9E/pZUj/Bl2ftbGp6OjySUbK2HJdsvTr1CWjpbudcru5JfE73 A+2F5kMdVVCk65otqcryo5wLzwb82rDRFQzwyFZIYLHLNn7MYiZWkq//YfzKYqbk O3D+VGTIAM8wfIZsYuBuUaALGfyJkEMlCH1+QAdOiHL8zUPr4gZvZLTC1YuTU6ha r+HH6VnXT5gTk8Ll/vEfCrVkAZyss/MWJ/evh+96Z3wkkK8w00zJVfPwEfQMxISQ LlHF/BAxBIVhzLqesLiQ6AwSdg6pthJTAxhORPeH7JYdM6nC/VgnuUzS5gDA2dI= =l6xY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
