Hello, > However even then this is not a good test of HT - the point of HT is to > improve throughput in multi thread workloads and the benchmark suite is > basically single thread. What would be more interesting would be to > run a test with a constant background load also running. In theory > the HT should do a better job of balancing the load between the > benchmark and the background than the BSD scheduler can on it's own. I > don't have an HT box here or I'd try it but I'd love to know how it > comes out if somebody is up for it.
It would be interesting to see the results of the BSD & ULE scheduler on 5.4 Pre and 6 compared to 5.3R. --Nick --Nick _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
