On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On stardate Wed, 23 Mar 2005, the wise Andreas Davour entered:
Exactly the same.
As Erik (et al) wrote, it will all be pulled in and resolved as dependencies if you have a sufficienyly up-to-date ports tree.
Kind of annyoing that it wasn't caught before it was comitted at all, but considering the total confusion that reigns right now with two different acroread ports it's just what can be expected.
I did a cvsup 30 minutes ago, and then it worked.
/Andreas
Hmm I also did a cvsup, but it makes no difference, I still get the sam error. I guess I have an other problem on my system.
You'll have to pkg_delete the old acroread port, and I did a "make clean" as well. Try that, and it might work.
/Andreas
-- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
