Brian Curnow wrote:

I am new to BSD and just downloaded BSD 5.3-RELEASE.

I saw a few other posts on this issue but I didn't see
any solutions.

I am getting excessive calcru: negative runtime
messages in the syslog (and the console).

According to the FAQ the solution is to use sysctl and
set kern.timecounter.method=1, however this param does
not exist in 5.3.

Is there a solution to this issue?

Thanks!

Brian Curnow



$sysctl -a | grep timeco kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0 kern.timecounter.nbinuptime: 4005177648 kern.timecounter.nnanouptime: 0 kern.timecounter.nmicrouptime: 1108115 kern.timecounter.nbintime: 1813993971 kern.timecounter.nnanotime: 207315298 kern.timecounter.nmicrotime: 1606545859 kern.timecounter.ngetbinuptime: 0 kern.timecounter.ngetnanouptime: 115004537 kern.timecounter.ngetmicrouptime: 3989727579 kern.timecounter.ngetbintime: 0 kern.timecounter.ngetnanotime: 526 kern.timecounter.ngetmicrotime: 201307619 kern.timecounter.nsetclock: 7 kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(800) ACPI-fast(1000) i8254(0) dummy(-1000000) kern.timecounter.tick: 1

I'm not the expert here, but I think I've experience.

Examine the options your system has for "kern.timecounter.choice"
(you can see above how I did it) and experiment until you find (if you
find) a setting that seems to fix the problem.  Certain chipsets
seem to have issues, but I couldn't say which ones.  I have, however,
fixed a couple of boxes by picking a different value for this sysctl.

It's likely that the FAQ hasn't yet been completely transformed
into a "post-5.3-is-now-stable" format, since people were warned
that 5.0-5.2 weren't "production releases".  If you find that this
helps you, write back and I'll try sometime Real Soon Now(tm)
to send a patch to the FDP folks to address that issue....

HTH,

Kevin Kinsey
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to