Bob Johnson wrote: > Jesse Guardiani wrote: > >>On Thursday 03 March 2005 5:41 pm, [someone] wrote: >> >> >>> >>>I'm not sure I understand the problem. If you don't want to create more >>>partitions, then don't. You can make an 80gb (or 300gb, or whatever) >>>drive into two partitions - a swap partition (2gig) and a / partition >>>(78 gig) and install FreeBSD just fine. >>> >>> >> >>Doesn't the boot partition have to NOT have soft updates though? >> >> > No, I don't think so.
Then why doesn't sysinstall enable soft updates on the root FS by default? >>I created the setup you described about a year ago with 5.2.1, and >>I had serious problems if the system ever hard rebooted after a >>power failure. Single user manual fsck's and all that. >> >> >> >> > That configuration should not make serious fs corruption more likely, it > just > makes it more likely to happen on the / partition (!). :) > In general, the > FreeBSD > filesystem is highly tolerant of things like power failures, and should > be even > better when softupdates is turned on. But it can fail, and 5.2.1 was NOT > considered a production release, so that could have also played a role in > your problems. I don't remember if softupdates had problems on 5.2.1 or > not. Look, I'm not new to FreeBSD. I know all of this. I just want to know if it's possible to tell my boot loader which device my root partition is on. >>>It's *best* to make more >>>partitions (esp for /var) so that if something goes out of control >>>logging, or you just neglect your logs, it doesn't go and fill up your >>>only (ie / ) partition. Like most *nix OS's, it can be as simple or as >>>complicated as you want it to be. >>> >>> >> >>I want / + /boot. It's that simple. >> >> >> > > What are you really trying to accomplish? Reliability and efficient use of disk space. > You want to run softupdates > on / ? No, I want to consolidate all of my mount points while simultaneously running softupdates on everything BUT the boot partition. > I believe it is perfectly acceptable to use softupdates on the root > partition these > days. I don't. It hasn't worked well in the past. > The Handbook recommends turning on softupdates for all filesystems. > See > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-disk.html > > I'm pretty sure my test system at home has only / and swap (because it > has a small hard drive), and uses softupdates on /. I'll check when I get > home. Yes, please let me know how well it responds to a hard power cycle. A normal FreeBSD system without softupdates on the root or boot partition should come right back up without a manual fsck. In my experience, if softupdates are used on the root partition and the root partition doubles as the boot partition then you'll have much more difficulty recovering from a power failure. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
