Anthony Atkielski wrote:
In the sense of resource usage is what I mean when I say heavy weight. While KDE is quite popular, there are probly (litterally) hundreds of window managers that will run under X, so saying "Everyone uses N window manager" is going to be patently false.Laurence Sanford writes:
Well, I don't use KDE because I don't particularly like heavyweight
software unless I need it ...
Heavyweight in the sense of resources required, or complexity, or what?
I got the impression that KDE was the one that everyone used.
Which window manager most closely approximates the GUI of traditional UNIX workstations?
Is it possible to install multiple X servers on the same machine so that one can fire up whichever one strikes one's fancy at a given time?
You'll only need one X server - what you're looking at having multiple versions of is the window manager. That's what runs over top of X to provide the style.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
