On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:57:33PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > I was wondering about the status of gvinum in 5.3. > > I seem to remember that there were a lot of problems with gvinum in 5.3, > but searching around, I can't seem to find anything that says for sure > one way or the other. > > I'm just trying to seperate the FUD from the reality. Is there anywhere > that has the status? Anyone using gvinum that can say how reliable it > is or isn't? > > I understand that there are GEOM classes available that have some of > the functionality of vinum that I could use instead, but there are > two reasons that these aren't an option for me. > 1) I'm wanting to migrate 4.X machines with existing vinum volumes to > 5, and I'd rather not dump/restore.
FreeBSD 5.x also has the original vinum implementation plus gvinum so it should be possible to use that instead of needing to dump/restore. Though I think that there are a couple of limitations like no swap on the original vinum do to the addition of GEOM. > 2) There is at least one feature that vinum has that I don't see in > any GEOM class, that I'm using. That is the ability to add subdisks > and use growfs to enlarge filesystems without having to dump/restore. I think that either geom_ccd or geom_concat will allow you to concat more drives in and then use growfs to expand the fs. > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
