On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:37:43 +0100 Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julio Capote writes: > > > Untrue, I know a NUMBER of emerging graphic artists, who would kill > > for this kind of exposure, and are much better than any > > commercialized firm I've seen. > > If they are so good, why would they kill for this kind of exposure? > > The world of commercial art is no exception to the rule that you get > what you pay for. Good graphic art is worth paying for; for a price > of zero dollars, you'll get zero quality. Exceptions are very, very > rare, and cannot be depended on. And an amateurish logo would be > quite a liability. You make it sound as if the FreeBSD project paid a million dollars for the current drawing of "Beastie". After all, we get what we pay for, and the current mascot/logo is "perfect", right? Jacob _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
