On Wednesday 09 February 2005 19:30, Nathan Kinkade wrote: [snip] > > I had already tried dumpfs, but couldn't find any information about > actual filesystem fragmentation in the output. Erik's suggestion of > running `# fsck -t ufs2 /usr` seemed to work, though I felt a little > skittish about running it on a live filesystem. You can(must) use mksnap_ffs to take a snapshot and fsck that. Note that snapshots are meant to be read-only, so fsck -n, mount -r etc...
> It found numerous > errors and auto-answered "no" for all of them, though I never specified > that it should do that. Does fsck just do this by default on a mounted > filesystem? Also, I had tried running fsck manually earlier and the > only difference between what I did and Erik's suggestion was the -t > option, which I wouldn't think should have been necessary. Shouldn't > fsck be able to determine the fs type by looking at the superblock? > > By the way, the fragmentation was as 5.1%. Quite high, and I'm > wondering how it got that way? Squid? > > Thanks, > Nathan _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
