On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800, Tabor Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back > >>it up? > > > > > > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :) > > > > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around > > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so. > > I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone > uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention > that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows. >
i knew you where going to say that , let me fire some counter measures by saying that GTK2 + GIMP works excellent on windows XP _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
