John wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 11:35:49PM -0800, Joshua Tinnin wrote:
On Saturday 15 January 2005 09:57 pm, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:47:13PM -0800, Joshua Tinnin wrote:wrote:
On Saturday 15 January 2005 07:23 pm, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You may have an issue with DNS. You should have DNS servers listed in your /etc/resolv.conf, like this:Oh, and figure out WHAT is going on with Konqueror. On some webWell, it just told you what's happening. It's waiting to load some
sites, it is just fine and dandy, but on other web sites, it just
is GLACIAL. I'm talking about MINUTES to render a page. The CPU
isn't busy, there's no IO going on - I have NO IDEA what it is
waiting for. It's so bad, it stretches credibility. Then, as I
said, on other web sites, it's just fine. Sometimes is stops
with 94% loaded and just waits a couple minutes - sometimes it
pauses with like "12 out of 19 image loaded," and sometimes it
pauses just as soon as it resolves the new URL and connects to
the server. VERY odd.
images and the page won't render until it happens. IIRC, this
happens because of image tags without size parameters, though I'm
not entirely
Thanks for your response, Joshua!
Well, your answer is very reasonable given the information I
supplied, but it is not what's happening. I can have my Windoze
work-owned laptop next to it on the table, and it will load up
these pages in a snap. Konqueror isn't getting any data - it sits
there with nothing happening - no data coming across the network.
nameserver 888.888.888.888
(the number is an example - you should use your ISP's nameserver or your internal one, if you've set it up)
Is this also an issue with other browsers or network software? If you haven't done so already, you should try Firefox or Opera and see if Konqueror is the problem.
Opera does not have this problem. It appears to be unique to
Konqueror. Odd - but I was going to shop around for a different
browser, anyway.
Month late, kilodollars short. Probably I'm just griping, but some food for thought:
Oh, the cruft that gets put on the WWW these daze. ActiveX,
Java applets, Flash, bla bla ... unless you're sure that you were only
looking at sites displaying *relatively compliant* (X)HTML, you can't trust
just any site to work on just any browser without a lot of often
hair-raising work in browser configuration and installation of plugins.
There's a whole bunch of $PLURAL_ADJECTIVE_NOUN out there who don't know about standards and don't care, and they are quite responsible for a number of my griefs with browsers on FreeBSD.
The other day I followed a link that led to some site with an "Any Da _ _
Browser" logo. Loved the thought, and we should all do that --- there
are standards. But, of course, I can't use that graphic on most of my sites....
Kevin Kinsey _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
