In a message dated 1/5/05 7:39:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Your point might have some teeth if the "newer" version were better, but >the entire problem is that 5.x is much worse than 4.x, so there lies the >issue. 4.10 is NOT supposed to be an "old" version. Its the production >version. Because its readily admitted that 5.x is not yet ready for >prime time by those in the know. And its not properly suppored. > > > >Thats strange, http://www.freebsd.org says 5.3 is the Production release >and 4.10 is the (legacy) production release I> guess they just dont teach you words like "legacy" in troll school.
And why is that, when Robert Watson has outlined, on this list, why 5.x isnt ready yet? I find it amazing that not one person in this stupid customer base cares about that fact? Are you all a bunch of wireless college kids or something? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
