Yeh that would further optimize the compiled code. Go ahead and use it. Regards S.
Indian Institute of Information Technology Subhro Sankha Kar Block AQ-13/1, Sector V Salt Lake City PIN 700091 India > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 7:33 > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: CPUTYPE directive options in /etc/make.conf > > In regards to using the 'CPUTYPE=' directive in the '/etc/make.conf' file, > would it be advisable to use the CPU type; i.e., p2 for instance rather > than i686. This is assuming that the processor is detected by FreeBSD as > an Intel PII, i686 as an example. > > Is there an advantage to using the 'p?' designation over the numeric > (i686) designation? > > Thanks! > > Gerard Seibert > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > An architect's most useful tools are an eraser at the drafting board, and > a wrecking bar at the site > > - Frank Lloyd Wright > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
