Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With that in mind, sometimes, the very best memory test programs can give > you better ideas that memory you thought was failing IS failing. The > opposite, proving that memory is good, is just totally, totally useless, > you cannot take any data home at all about your memory being good.
That's exactly right. The false negative rate is quite high, but the false positive rate is virtually zero. However, this makes it far from useless, because in cases like the question that started the thread, bad memory *is* extremely likely to be the cause, and a software memory tester is probably going to report that. Given the frequency with which messages on this list say "no, it can't be bad memory because it works under Windows," this is *extremely* useful. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
