On 2004-10-26 00:04, "Loren M. Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:45:55AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2004-10-23 22:52, John Oxley wrote: >>> Not to start a flame war on which is the better editor, but vim with >>> ctags is my way. >> >> Yeah, I know :-) >> >> I use both Emacs and vim, with reasonable levels of comfort. I haven't >> found a way to convince ctags that it's ok for a tag to appear multiple >> times (which can really be annoying when editing the sources of a kernel, >> where names are *bound* to appear multiple times), but I know what you >> mean. > > Are you using exuberant ctags? I've had problems with various other ctags > programs choking before, but exuberant has usually worked instead. Now I > know that I had some programs with exuberant ctags with the linux kernel > before, but I think if exuberant knows all the defines then it should be > able to figure out which tag is correct by way of the c pre-processor.
I don't think so. I tried using `/usr/bin/ctags' but being able to do my work with Emacs' support for tags didn't search for other vim-compatible tagging tools. I see now that Exuberant Ctags is available as the devel/ctags port. Perhaps it would be nice to try it out one of these days. Apparently it doesn't even conflict with the /usr/local/bin/ctags executable that comes with Emacs (it's installed as exctags in the same directory). Coolness! _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
