On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 03:43:43PM +0100, John Murphy wrote: > P Stalidis wrote: > >hello, > >I'm trying to find one of the earliest versions of freeBSD... 1.0 would > >be fine! I'm trying to get an intel i386sx33 with only 1mb of ram, up > >and running again... so any help is welcome > >thanks in advance :) > > There's an ftp search engine at > http://www.freewareweb.com/ftpsearch.shtml > which shows some hits if you search for freebsd-1* > > The oldest version with release notes on the FreeBSD web site is 1.1 > but it says "the 386sx is not recommended" so I wish you luck. > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/1.1/RELNOTES.FreeBSD
I thought FreeBSD 1.x was illegal (or at least a bad idea) to use because of the tainted BSD Lite code. And also, I'm wondering how much bloat does 5.x add that can't be removed with a custom kernel. I know linux 2.6 has a specific section for removing extra features like the new I/O schedulers for embedded devices that couldn't really use it anyways. Is 1.x/2.x really better to use for old hardware? > > -- > John. > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > !DSPAM:417bc0b7219791736320828! > -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C
pgpVcEZnSzlTR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
