Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0600, Josh Hansen wrote:Your'e right of course, there weren't many details originally given, and the answer could be that simple. I do realize that my first post was out of line and I apologized to Bill off-list. I just thought that:
Bill Moran wrote:
I really don't think the problem is that simple. How about either giving him a real answer or none at all?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I?ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled
to linux. I checked several compile options, but it did not have good results.
5.2.1 is not a strong performer. It's ALPHA code.
If you want to do performance testing, either use 4.10, or work with the 5.3 BETAs. 5.2.1 isn't supposed to be fast yet.
It's hard to give a good answer to a bad question :)
In order to accurately diagnose the problem we need a way to repeat it, or at least a full description of what was tried (including source code and details of the benchmark measurements). Otherwise, all we can do is guess what might be going on.
Kris
A: With such a lack of important details in the first post, blaming the problem on the FreeBSD version was a bit pre-mature, and
B: Even with the speed issues in 5.2.1, 50% is quite a large difference, so I thought it was likely that there was something else going on, but of course, like you said, we would need more information to determine what. Also, the original poster should definitely be using 5.3 instead for this thing.
-Josh
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
