On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 11:16:51PM -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > On Monday 06 September 2004 11:11 am, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Another way: - this changes the default database (btriev) to hash > > > > setenv PORTS_DBDRIVER bdb1_hash > > > > then run your portdb -u > > In fact, I opted for this one. I now run my ports tree updating > > scripts as I did BEFORE these issues. > > What sort of effect might this have elsewhere? I'm sure this fix works, > but is there something else that could get borked by changing the > default database?
I used this on a box w/ multiple failures of ruby; I have since noticed no issues. The only difference is that I used this: ENV['PORTS_DBDRIVER'] = 'dbm_hash' from: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=638936+0+current/freebsd-ports -- One million points of light shining on the new world-order model for fascism and tyranny. Get in line. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
