> > Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and > > recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing. > > OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is trying to get it > from > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/All > where the version of png is 1.2.5_2, so how to resolve the conflict? > Seems to me that portupgrade(1) needs to be getting the packages from > packages-4-stable/All instead? > > > Staying behind is a good way to end up with a security > black hole :). > > Precisely. > > > A cvsup of ports-all and a portsdb -uU should be a good way to keep > > your system current. > > > > Will that change where portupgrade(1) tries to get the packages from?
I believe the package updates will lag behind the ports source update i.e. if you use portupgrade -PP and use packages only there will be the occasional port that does not have a package available. I'm not sure how long the lag is... I guess different for different ports. I think you'll just have to accept a slight lag on when you can update certain ports. If this is not the real error I'm sure someone will correct me. Thanks, Phil. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
