On Thursday, 19 August 2004 at 15:52:54 +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:01:07AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> >> Interesting. I've just had a very bad experience with Canon's >> scanners. See >> http://wwww.lemis.com/grog/product-reviews/Canon-breakage.html for the >> whole sad story. >> > > Unfortunately, I'm not surprised. Since USB is the scanners "standard" > interface, I noted more and more "bad" scanners: bad/weak GUI > (for example the GUI coming with some EPSON Perfection scanners is the > worst I ever used), bad performance, cheap/buggy hardware.
I think that the real issue is the fact that people tend to consider the hardware and software as integral. The Canon hardware is terrible. The Canon GUI is, well, a GUI. It's also broken. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
pgpswvXP2DAy6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
