Hey Andrew,

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:21:45 -0400, Andrew Kilpatrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the info.
> 
> > Greetings!
> >
> >  From what I gather, the 5.2-RELEASE was rather buggy and unstable (for
> > a RELEASE anyway), and was quickly replaced by 5.2.1-RELEASE which was a
> > considerable improvement.
> 
> I've been using it as my main machine for some time and it works well. But
> I'll definitely upgrade at some point. Right now I am testing on my
> workstation as I my test machine is doing something else right now.

There were some considerable problems with specific ATA chipsets in
5.2-RELEASE that were fixed in 5.2.1. But if you don't have any
problems, that's of course not a reason to upgrade.

> 
> > You're sparked my curiosity; what kind of embedded system are you
> > working on, pray tell?
> 
> It's a theatrical lighting board. So far FreeBSD has satisfied all my
> requirements, so I've been really happy. I come from the NetBSD side of
> things. My distro is 18 megs plus my code and some other stuff. Ideally it
> will all fit in under 100 megs and boot off a flash memory disk. It's fun
> stuff, and should be done soon......

I have a 80MB Flash disk that boots with X and some graphical
applications, also for an embedded application, 5.2-RELEASE-based too.
Works like a charm!

Arjan
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to