On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 12:36:47 -0400 Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Risdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Robert Huff wrote: > > > > >Peter Risdon writes: > > > > > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch sees > > >> many commits that are likely to be problematic. > > >> > > > In general, no. > > > On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: > > >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some > > >absolutely critical deadline. > > > > > > > QED > > I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ... > > What's "QED"? > > -- > Bill Moran If I recall correctly, it's Latin: "quod erat demonstrandum", meaning "as it has been demonstrated". Andrew Gould _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
