On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 10:01:54AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
> >On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 10:00:58PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >>According to the RFCs, one MUST NOT bounce mail sent to postmaster.
> >>One ought to read the rfc-ignorant.org site I mentioned.
> [ ... ]
> > Well, bit again. The line in my access file was
> >
> > 206.46 550 Verizon email not wanted here
> >
> > that I've commented out. This isn't the first time I've had
> > to fine tune; it probably won't be the last. Apologies!
>
> Consider using FEATURE(`delay_checks', `friend') and add the following to
> the access map:
>
> Spam:abuse@ FRIEND
> Spam:postmaster@ FRIEND
>
> [ Pre 8.12 versions of sendmail use To: instead ]
>
> ...which will allow you to block mail as you please using IP or other
> reject rules, yet not prevent delivery of mail to postmaster and abuse...
>
Outstanding idea, at least it seems. This site has all
the details:
http://www.technoids.org/spamlovers.html
I think that most email to postmaster should be allowed,
any everything to abuse.
thanks for the tip! (and a tip of the hat),
gary
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
