On Sunday 04 April 2004 08:07 am, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > # portupgrade -f lang/ruby18 > > Stale dependency: ruby-1.8.1_2 --> openssl-0.9.7d -- manually run > > 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > > # pkgdb -F > > ---> Checking the package registry database > > Stale dependency: openldap-client-2.1.29 -> openssl-0.9.7d > > (security/openssl): openoffice-1.1.0_1 (score:23%) ? ---- <snip> ---- > > What is this? I don't understand the question... Is this documented > > anywhere? > > You didn't do a portupgrade -rRa. The easy way is to upgrade or install > openssl-0.9.7d. Thanks, Kent. I was following the procedure in /usr/ports/UPDATING, and the question seemed so out of context... I mean "openoffice-1.1.0_1(score:23%)" - what's with that? Anyway, as I read ports-using.html from the Handbook, portupgrade -a is a "superset" of "portupgrade -rRa"... is that correct? Bottom line here (in my case) is this: I'm afraid my ports tree may be BFU; this all started when I tried to install the "K3b" port which apparently has a bazillion dependencies. At least one of the tar.gz files couldn't be located, and things have kind of gone downhill from there :( For me, I'm afraid that salvation may require "wiping" the entire ports tree, and re-installing it from the 5.2 cd. Is there a safe & clean way to do that? Thanks, Jay _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
