Dave Watkins writes:
> I've just setup my first IPv6 router following the documentation
> here
>
> http://justjohnnyweb.net/~cruisefx/Documents/IPv6/HOWTO_Debian_Masq_IPV6.html
>
> and rather than having a 3ffe:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx/64 number
> assigned I have a 3ffe:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx/128 whichs seems
> to break things further down the chain as radvd then complains in
> the logs that "prefix length should be 64 for eth0".
>
> Is this something I have done wrong somewhere or is this
> something happening further up the chain?
For what it's worth:
gif0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1280
tunnel inet 209.6.197.67 --> 206.123.31.115
inet6 3ffe:bc0:8000::2b31 --> 3ffe:bc0:8000::2b30 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::2c0:95ff:fef8:17af%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
Everything works; nothing complains. "It ain't broke.".
Have you asked [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Huff
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
