> > ... > > I imagine your answer will be something like "We don't care; do what you > want," but I would like to present the different ideas, and perhaps you > would prefer one. > > So, please put these in the order of most to least preferred, and say why > you like or dislike any of them. >
Ok, Here are my addled thoughts: Good: > - All mount points in / (e.g. /cdrom, /camera, /windows/C) <- current > FreeBSD standard (Just come up with a nice sounding name for each) > - Under something like /media/ as in /media/cdrom, etc (except the name media may become obsolete) > - Anyplace but /mnt (i.e. what the FHS 2.2 currently specifies) Except not /var/ or /usr or /home or /tmp Less Good: > - All mount points in /mnt (e.g. /mnt/cdrom, /mnt/camera, /mnt/windows/C) > <- breaks > FreeBSD standard for an empty /mnt NOT: These are too long and cumbersom, may contradict other usage Especially not /var... as it is something else and /media/windows... is also too MS specific. > - Anyplace but / or /mnt (e.g. /vol/cdrom, /var/mnt/camera, > /media/windows/C) > (some suggestions have been /media, /mounts, /vol, /var/mnt, > and /var/tmp/removable. Others?) > Anyplace at all Now, that is not much of a standard - why bother? > > Thanks letting us know how you feel about this, > > Frank Murphy > _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"