On Monday 03 November 2003 00:21, parv wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> wrote sebastian ssmoller thusly...
*SNIP*
> Would it be too doggedly of me to suggest to use mutt instead?  I mean
> just look at it...
>
>   # cd /usr3/ports/mail/mutt
>   # make pretty-print-build-depends-list
>   This port requires package(s) "autoconf-2.13.000227_5 automake-1.4.5_9
> docbook-1.2_1 docbook-241_2 docbook-3.0_2 docbook-3.1_2 docbook-4.0_2
> docbook-4.1_2 expat-1.95.6_1 gettext-0.12.1 iso8879-1986_2 jade-1.2.1_5
> libiconv-1.9.1_3 linuxdoc-1.1_1 m4-1.4_1 sgmlformat-1.7_2 xmlcatmgr-1.1" to
> build.

Well, even this incredible slow thunderbird was better than evolution IMHO.
(Brings me to the question why under Win it responds reasonably but under 
FreeBSD you need lots of Baldrian-Mass (Mass= one bavarian beer unit, the big 
one and Baldrian is a homeopathic tranquilization drug) if you try to read 
more than 10 Mails/hour)
But that's another subject. (I love pine and kmail for GUI)

-Harry
>
>
>   - Parv

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature

Reply via email to