On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:28:40PM -0500, george donnelly wrote: > [Marc Wiz wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 8/1/03 12:51 PM] > > >>> What kind of bandwidth do your users have? e.g., right now I am using > >>> emacs over ssh to a friends box, where the limiting bandwidth is > >>> 128kbits/s (that's the upstream dsl on the remote end.), and I > >>> find it usable. However if your users will be comming in via > >>> modem, IMO, modern emacs is no longer usable over modem (though > >>> older emmacs were). > >> > >> bandwidth is good, 100Mbps etc. > >> > >> i guess i'm looking for something with decent features but that will not use > >> up a lot of RAM or processor. > >> > > > > What do you consider a lot of RAM or processor? > > more than a few MB per session. > > > It amazes me how people used to berate emacs for it's use of resources > > yet it does one heck of a lot stuff especially considering the > > amount of resources a web browser takes. > > i'm not berating it, just trying to make a decision.
I understand. It's just a small gripe of mine. This thread just gave me a chance to present the gripe :-) Marc -- Marc Wiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, that really is my last name. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
