Hello,

It is usually not about disk space (though that is also not exactly free and unlimited either), but about compilation/update delays, ease of management, additional security risks, additional ways to fail for the system as a whole, etc.
Not to mention simple elegance.
Best wishes
Eugene



-----Original Message----- From: Bill Tillman
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 7:26 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: X client without X server

Just my 2ยข worth on this. Sure, one always wants to keep overhead low. But the days of limited RAM, small hard drives, etc...are long since behind us. I remember in 1994 when and IT consultant came in and built a Novell server for us with a whopping 1 GB hard drive. And back then how we thought with a 1 GB hard drive we'd never run out of space. Well these days one could easily run out of space with such a small hard drive. But with today's systems having 2 or 3 TB drives and GB's of RAM, something as trivial as X-Server should not be a problem. If you don't need it, don't run it. But to worry about the space it takes up is kind of a moot point these days. And like some of the other replies mentioned, xterm may not require it, but one of xterm's dependencies may. I run Asterisk routinely on my systems and I'm always amazed at how installing one port requires no less than 38 other ports to be installed as well.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to