Le 17/05/2013 ? 20:03:30-0400, Paul Kraus a écrit > > ZFS is stable, it is NOT as tuned as UFS just due to age. UFS in all of it's > various incarnations has been tuned far more than any filesystem has any > right to be. I spent many years managing Solaris system and I was truly > amazed at how tuned the Solaris version of UFS was. > > I have been running a number of 9.0 and 9.1 servers in production, all > running ZFS for both OS and data, with no FS related issues.
Have you ever try to update a ZFS Pool on 9.0 to 9.1 ? I've a server with a big zpool in 9.0 I'm wonder if it's good idea to upgrade to 9.1. If I lost the data I'm close to dead person. If I thinking to upgrade to 9.1 it's because I got small issue about NFSD, LACP. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: jeu 23 mai 2013 10:51:49 CEST _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
