On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:43:03 +1000
Da Rock <freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> Interesting. My only observation was that sysctl is supposed to be the
> 'system' database where all queries relate to. It is supposed to display
> everything about the system; therefore any of these data bits should be
> fixed here first. Anything else would be a 'feature' :)
That would be nice - one way to achieve that would be to add a
writable oid for patch level and not bump newvers.sh for patches.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st...@sohara.org>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
