On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Teske, Devin <devin.te...@fisglobal.com>wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Teske, Devin
> <devin.te...@fisglobal.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, maybe im at a loss here in the way my brain is viewing this
>> >
>> > we have a box, its got 2 nodes in the chassis, and 32 sata drives
>> > attached to a SATA/SAS backplane via 4 (2 per node) LSI MPT SAS2 cards
>> > should i not logically be seeing 4 controllers X #drive count ??
>> >
>> > camcontrol devlist shows 32 devices, daX,passX and sesX,passX
>> >
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus0 target 9 lun 0 (da0,pass0)
>> > <STORBRICK-3 1400> at scbus0 target 10 lun 0 (ses0,pass1)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus0 target 11 lun 0 (da1,pass2)
>> > <STORBRICK-1 1400> at scbus0 target 12 lun 0 (ses1,pass3)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus0 target 13 lun 0 (da2,pass4)
>> > <STORBRICK-2 1400> at scbus0 target 14 lun 0 (ses2,pass5)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus0 target 15 lun 0 (da3,pass6)
>> > <STORBRICK-4 1400> at scbus0 target 16 lun 0 (ses3,pass7)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus0 target 17 lun 0 (da4,pass8)
>> > <STORBRICK-6 1400> at scbus0 target 18 lun 0 (ses4,pass9)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus0 target 19 lun 0
>> (da5,pass10)
>> > <STORBRICK-0 1400> at scbus0 target 20 lun 0 (ses5,pass11)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus0 target 21 lun 0
>> (da6,pass12)
>> > <STORBRICK-7 1400> at scbus0 target 22 lun 0 (ses6,pass13)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus0 target 23 lun 0
>> (da7,pass14)
>> > <STORBRICK-5 1400> at scbus0 target 24 lun 0 (ses7,pass15)
>> > <SEAGATE ST9300605SS 0004> at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (da8,pass16)
>> > <SEAGATE ST9300605SS 0004> at scbus1 target 1 lun 0 (da9,pass17)
>> > <STORBRICK-3 1400> at scbus8 target 10 lun 0 (ses8,pass19)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus8 target 11 lun 0
>> (da11,pass20)
>> > <STORBRICK-1 1400> at scbus8 target 12 lun 0 (ses9,pass21)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus8 target 13 lun 0
>> (da12,pass22)
>> > <STORBRICK-2 1400> at scbus8 target 14 lun 0 (ses10,pass23)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus8 target 15 lun 0
>> (da13,pass24)
>> > <STORBRICK-4 1400> at scbus8 target 16 lun 0 (ses11,pass25)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus8 target 17 lun 0
>> (da14,pass26)
>> > <STORBRICK-6 1400> at scbus8 target 18 lun 0 (ses12,pass27)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus8 target 19 lun 0
>> (da15,pass28)
>> > <STORBRICK-0 1400> at scbus8 target 20 lun 0 (ses13,pass29)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus8 target 21 lun 0
>> (da16,pass30)
>> > <STORBRICK-7 1400> at scbus8 target 22 lun 0 (ses14,pass31)
>> > <SEAGATE ST33000650SS 0004> at scbus8 target 23 lun 0
>> (da17,pass32)
>> > <STORBRICK-5 1400> at scbus8 target 24 lun 0 (ses15,pass33)
>> > <USB 2.0 Flash Drive 8.07> at scbus9 target 0 lun 0
>> (da18,pass34)
>> >
>> >
>> > we would like to create a zpool from all the devices, that in theory if
>> > nodeA failed
>> > then nodeB could force import the pool,
>>
>> gmultipath (which you mention in the subject) is the appropriate tool
>> for this, but there's no need for an import of the pool if you build the
>> pool out of multipath devices. In our experience, we can pull a cable and
>> zfs continues working just fine.
>>
>> In other words, don't build the pool out of the devices, put a gmultipath
>> label on each device and then use /dev/multipath/LABEL for the zpool
>> devices.
>>
>>
>> > nodeA and NodeB are attached through
>> > dual LSI controllers, to the SATA/SAS backplane. but i cant seem to
>> create
>> > a zpool from sesX or passX devices, i can however create a 16 drive
>> zp0ol
>> > on either node, from any daX device. what did i miss? ive looked at
>> > gmirror, and also ses documents. Any insight is appreciated, thanks in
>> > advance.
>>
>> gmirror is the wrong tool, gmultipath is what you want. The basic task
>> is to use "gmultipath label FOO da#" to write a cookie on the disk (used to
>> identify new/existing paths during GOEM "taste" events for example).
>>
>> After you've labeled the da# devices with gmultipath you say "gmultipath
>> status" to see the components of each label and you use "multipath/LABEL"
>> as your disk name when creating the zpool (these correspond directly to
>> /dev/multipath/LABEL, but "zpool create …" or "zpool add …" allow you to
>> omit the leading "/dev").
>>
>
> sanity check me on node A i did
>
> zpool destroy master
>
> gmultipath label FOO da0
>
> gmultipath status
> Name Status Components
> multipath/FOO DEGRADED da0 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-619648737 DEGRADED da1 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-191725652 DEGRADED da2 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1539342315 DEGRADED da3 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1276041606 DEGRADED da4 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-2000832198 DEGRADED da5 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1285640577 DEGRADED da6 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1816092574 DEGRADED da7 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1102254444 DEGRADED da8 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-330300690 DEGRADED da9 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-92140635 DEGRADED da10 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-855257672 DEGRADED da11 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1003634134 DEGRADED da12 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-2449862 DEGRADED da13 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1137080233 DEGRADED da14 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1696804371 DEGRADED da15 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-1304457562 DEGRADED da16 (ACTIVE)
> multipath/FOO-912159854 DEGRADED da17 (ACTIVE)
>
> now on node B i should do the same? reboot both nodes and i should be
> able "see" 32 multipath/FOO deices to create a pool from ?
>
>
> It appears from the above output that you labeled all of the block
> devices (da0 through da17) with the same label.
>
> This is not what you want.
>
> Use "gmultipath clear FOO" on each of the block devices and have another
> go using unique values.
>
> For example:
>
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN01 da0
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN02 da1
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN03 da2
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN04 da3
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN05 da4
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN06 da5
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN07 da6
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN08 da7
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN09 da8
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN10 da9
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN11 da10
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN12 da11
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN13 da12
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN14 da13
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN15 da14
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN16 da15
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN17 da16
> gmultipath label SATA_LUN18 da17
> ..
>
> Then "gmultipath status" should show your unique labels each with a
> single component.
>
> Then you would do:
>
> zpool create master multipath/SATA_LUN{01,02,03,04,05,06,…}
>
>
ahh ok got it, and probably on the other node
gmultipath label SATA_LUN19 da0
gmultipath label SATA_LUN20 da1
-------------------snip------------------------------
gmultipath label SATA_LUN36 da15
then create the zpool from the "36" multipath devices?
so if i create a 36 drive multipath zpool on nodeA when it fails do i just
import it to nodeB
i was thinking to use carp for failover..... so nodeB would continue nfs
sessions and import the zpool to nodeB
> --
> Devin
>
> _____________
> The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the
> message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message
> in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please
> be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving
> and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
