Hello,
Tryton is a three tier business application framework, consisting of a
common server component (finance/trytond), a client (finance/tryton)
and a large number of modules (finance/trytond_*) which add support
for specific business cases to it. At the time it was introduced to
the ports, version 2.4 was the latest major
version. Now version 2.6 is available.
I am going to continue maintaining version 2.4 as well as willing to
introduce 2.6.
The following discussion is a request for recommendation how to scale
this up to supporting more versions of Tryton in parallel.
Current:
finance/tryton (2.4.x)
finance/trytond (2.4.x)
finance/trytond_account (2.4.x)
.... [~40 more] ..... (2.4.x)
finance/trytond_account_statement (2.4.x)
Following the scheme of e.g. the mysql port, I would like to rename all the
current tryton ports like this:
finance/tryton24 (2.4.x)
finance/trytond24 (2.4.x)
finance/trytond_account24 (2.4.x)
.... [~40 more] ..... (2.4.x)
finance/trytond_account_statement24 (2.4.x)
The 2.6 series will then be introduced in this schema:
finance/tryton26 (2.6.x)
finance/trytond26 (2.6.x)
finance/trytond_account26 (2.6.x)
.... [~40 more] ..... (2.6.x)
finance/trytond_account_statement26 (2.6.x)
This leads to the two questions I have:
1) How will the renaming of the existing tryton ports to tryton24
handled properly? Just submit a PR "Please replace finance/tryton with
finance/tryton24" for each port?
2) Expecting more versions in the future, this will increase the
amount of ports (especially the finance/trytond_* modules) by almost
50 modules in the finance category per version. Would this be an issue?
Kind regards
Matthias
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
