On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:18:32PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
> > Polytropon articulated:
> >
> > > Allow me to provide just one example:
> > >
> > > More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
> > > http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html
> >
> > That doesn't appear to be a bug. It appears that the code is doing
> > exactly what the designer wanted it to do. At best this was an
> > oversight by the designer; at worse just plain incompetence.
I heard from "my technician" last night--on his way East for the
week. he send the URL for an 18MB file {from Dell} all about
this new paradigm. --like I've got the time to much around with
that much detail... .
someone, I think down-queue said something about the UEFI having
been designed to make it all the more difficult to drop on FBSD
[or anything *except* Doze. my tech echoed the same thing 8 days
ago when he dropped off the box.
I'm sure by now the BIOS has been hacked beyond reason--especially
with the 64-bit versions. Still, if I were designing a new "BIOS"
that supported the vast majority of my users [DOZE], I would use
every last trick I could dream of to strongly =discourage= anything
but Windows.
>
> That's quite possible. We've seen poorly implemented ACPI
> behaviour in "modern" BIOS as well, or manufacturers
> intendedly going "their way" to limit hardware in what
> it can do or what it will support.
Exactly; not to put to fine a point on this, but this is where I
smell "greed" as part of the picture/rationale.
> It's just my fear that UEFI won't do better per se, and
> that lazy or incompetent people will screw it up, and
> make it worse.
>
> The article mentions "legacy boot" to restore a somewhat
> "normal" behaviour...
>
ha! I tried the "legacy" route for hours without success. only when
I selected the UEFI did things start to work. and then, upon reboot,
I got the string "Cand Find Boot Sector; press any key to reboot"
nutshell, I'll scan thru the 18meg file that I have the pointer to.
but will probably ask for a "less-featureful" model.
>
> --
> Polytropon
> Magdeburg, Germany
> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
