On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Hexing <hexhex...@gmail.com> wrote: > per...@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) writes: > >> Bernt Hansson <b...@bananmonarki.se> wrote: >>> On 2012-11-17 21:36, Gary Aitken wrote: >>> > # portmaster -n emulators/wine-fbsd64 >>> > ===>>> No /usr/ports/emulators/wine-fbsd64 exists, and no information >>> > ===>>> about emulators/wine-fbsd64 can be found in /usr/ports/MOVED >>> > hints? >>> There has never been such a port, you have to install from package. >> >> Ordinarily, packages are created by building ports. >> If this one is an exception, how is it created? > > I guess that just remove it and install /usr/ports/emulators/wine or > /usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel would be OK.
Nope, not for amd64: % grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' /usr/ports/emulators/wine/Makefile ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 % grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' /usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel/Makefile ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 The wine and wine-devel ports won't even compile on amd64. There was some guy who claims to have managed creating a binary _package_ for amd64 somehow, and wo sent periodic announcement updates about to this list. I don't know if it was legit or not: I never install stuff bypassing ports. But apparently, he didn't create a _port_, nor did he modify/enhance the current i386-only wine ports. > The name 'wine-fbsd64' looks strange. You installed it before? and > when did you find this name? -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
