Yuri <yuri <at> rawbw.com> writes: > > On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1 > > Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as "stable" 9.X branch, why then > 9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC? > This looks strange to me. > > Yuri
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1/sys/conf/newvers.sh?view=log Go back to Revision 227495, read log text, click View and scroll down to see TYPE="FreeBSD" 34 REVISION="9.0" BRANCH="PRERELEASE" Then back off and move the log up by repeating as above. Hopefully you understand his drill :-) jb _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
