Warren Block schreef op :
The difference is that a local svn checkout has all the commit history. A comparison recently showed 700-some megabytes more space used by the svn checkout.
Although I believe the checkouts are bigger, I do not think they have all the commit history. This is where SVN and CVS differ from systems like Git or Mercury, which have all the history in a local working copy. I think the overhead of SVN consists of backups and cached copies of the previous revision, but I am not quite sure. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
