> Wiadomość napisana przez Doug Sampson w dniu 31 sie 2012, o godz. 01:42: > > [..] > > > group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<---- > - > > group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<---- > - > > This itself looks like a bug in setfacl(1). I'll look into it. > However... > > [..] > > > #!/bin/sh > > # run this script where you wish to effect the changes > > # reset perms to default > > find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b * > > Why the asterisk? Also, using "-m" with NFSv4 ACLs is not a very good > idea - it's supposed to work, but with NFSv4 ACLs the ordering does > matter, > and "-m" simply modifies the ACL entry in place, while the effect of the > entry might depend e.g. on "deny" entries before it. Use "-a" instead. >
Forgive me- I am not particularly strong when it comes to shell scripting. I will modify so that the -a parameter is used instead of -m when setting new entries. What would you use in place of the asterisk when you want to apply the "setfacl -b" command to either all files or all directories? The period? ~Doug _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
