For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this:
svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports
On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as
opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used
with subversion.
stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9
Could I then run:
svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/[ 91 9.1] /usr/ports/
or | and
svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports/ ?
Since in the past several years I installed minimal fbsd and then used
portsnap for ports, so I was not aware that -head was the only option for
ports- is that what Lowell was pointing out?
It turns out that mergemaster would have been alright in my case, due to
.mergemasterrc, I can not recall why this was selected, comments are
welcomed:
# cat .mergemasterrc
FREEBSD_ID=YES
VERBOSE=YES
AUTO_INSTALL=YES
RUN_UPDATES=YES
COMP_CONFS=YES
PRESERVE_FILES_DIR=/var/tmp/mergemaster/preserved-files-`date
+%y%m%d-%H%M%S`
DELETE_STALE_RC_FILES=YES
Kind regards,
Darrel
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
