29.07.2012, 00:29, "Matthias Petermann" <matth...@d2ux.net>: > Hi Darren, > > thanks for diving into the issue. I looked through the mentioned places in > the bsdinstall code and understand it now. > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:24:48 +0400 > Darren Baginski <kick...@yandex.com> wrote: > >> I thing release/arch selection has to be a part of the installer, either >> directly or via environment variables. > > Yes, I think so too. I guess there usually no FTP directories created for > patch level releases like 9.0-RELEASE-p3? Your proposal to introduce a new > environment variable like TARGET makes sense. This could work like an > override - when it is not set it can fall back to the default (using uname -r > which makes sense for the installation media). > > Should I file a PR or did you already?
No, feel free to open if you feel it needed. I would say it's more a feature request, but without it, bsdinstall not usable on non release environments. > > Thanks, > Matthias > > -- > Matthias Petermann <matth...@d2ux.net> _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
