On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Wojciech Puchar < woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
> >>> >>> interesting idea but the options ZFS would give you are superior to this >> setup. >> > > Were you just unable to understand my setup or a reasons to do this? > > please reread former post and possibly ask again if you don't understand > the reasons. > > I ignore performance issues completely for now. I do understand your setup but I dont have too agree that it is a good solution. I know you think it's the best and only one :) > > > But I have still not seen any evidence/facts that ZFS looses more >> data than UFS. >> > > And you've never seen me, yet i still exist. > Really? that's you anwser to my question. The most childish answer I could image. You have a gift to troll and ruine every topic with this kind of answers.... _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
