Hi, On Wednesday 09 May 2012 20:30:37 Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Erich Dollansky > <er...@alogreentechnologies.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 18:57:06 Alejandro Imass wrote: > >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Alejandro Imass <a...@p2ee.org> wrote: > >> > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Robert Bonomi <bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> >> One comment: for 'defensive' purposes it would be useful to break ad6 up > >> >> into two slices, putting 'basejail' in it's own slice. Then, for > >> >> production > >> >> use, that slice can be mounted RO, and with the 'system immutable' flag > >> >> set on everything in that filesystem. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Yes. From one of your posts that became somewhat clear to me: Having > >> > all the jails on a single 150GB slice seems like a bad idea. > >> > > >> > >> For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences > >> of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice? > >> > > it could be a misunderstanding. What is a partition? What is a slice. I > > have to look always into the handbook. Anyway, as long the OS see different > > units which have to be mounted independent of each other, it all does not > > matter what is what. > > > > I meant in Unix terms of course. Slice is slice (partition in other > OS) and partition a thru h > > The question is if it has any advantage of using a slice to mount the > basejail in RO as opposed to doing the same thing on a partition. > I do not think so. As long it is mounted as a separated unit, FreeBSD has to keep everything separated.
Erich _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
