Hi, I think that your irony detectors got damaged while reading my post. I am sorry for this.
On Sunday 11 March 2012 10:53:26 Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:31:33PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > On Saturday 10 March 2012 22:08:37 Alejandro Imass wrote: > > > > > > ALL of Windows' problems are precisely based on poor design... just to > > > name a few: > > > > - apps re-write system libs at will > > > > Isn't this another masterpiece FreeBSD is far off achieving? > > I'm not aware of any cases where installing or firing up an editor, web > server, or mail user agent alters base system libraries. I think you are > mistaken. > Isn't this a cool feature? > > > > > > - no lib versioning > > > > I think that you are wrong here. It a long time ago but I think I > > remember they put a version number into the library name. > > I read "no lib versioning" as meaning "we don't get the same support for > being able to use multiple versions of a library for different purposes," > but maybe I'm mistaken. How can you say this? > > > > - no filesystem-based security > > > > FAT rules! > > Uh . . . what? It is on every phone, every camera, every toaster ... > > > > - default network protocols are insecure > > > > Windows has meanwhile default network protocols? I think, I have to do > > some catching up. > > I suspect this was a reference to things like SMB/CIFS and other common > networking protocols and toolsets on MS Windows systems. Is this all in there by default? Erich _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
