On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:39:58 +0100 Polytropon articulated: > However, there are differences in how you judge documentation > to be _good_. Talk to a mainframer, and he will tell you a > different story. Then talk to a "Windows" person and explain > what documentation is, and he'll tell you that you don't > need it. :-)
Poly, I think you just broke your own record for retarded statements. If you were to expand your statement to include documentation for drivers for "N" protocol devices, FreeBSD users would say that they don't need it either since they don't have such drivers. The fact is that Windows was designed to "just work" so that users could spend their time on the project(s) they wanted to work on and not reading tons of frivolous garbage on simple things like networking two or more computers together. Poly, you have stated several times in a multitude of posts that you neither use nor understand MS Windows. For most people, that alone would preclude them from making a statement on said subject. Obviously, talking about something you readily admit to having no knowledge about is no problem for you. Pathetic. For your own info, I am compiling a list of totally contradictory statements you have made in the past year or so and am planning on including it into an article I am writing. And no, I don't need your permission. You relinquished all rights once you posted them on a publicly available forum. I all ready checked. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Often things ARE as bad as they seem! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
