On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:58:21PM +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:19:15 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > well... rxvt-unicode-256color was the effect of the checkins for termcap.src > > for conf/152713 and conf/153164 > > > > The earlier one suggests that the naming came from rxvt-unicode's sources. > > Checking that, it seems that the rxvt-unicode entry specifies 88 colors, > > while the rxvt-unicode-256color entry (close to rxvt-256color) does 256. > > > > However, the rxvt-unicode entry in FreeBSD was added for conf/117323, > > which equated it to rxvt-mono (no color), with some changes for > > function-keys. > > > > On the other hand, the rxvt entry uses color, which was overlooked in > > conf/117323: > > > > # Termcap entry for rxvt-unicode, taken from > > http://cvs.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/doc/rxvt.7.html#I_need_a_termcap_file_entry > > rxvt-unicode|rxvt-unicode terminal (X Window System):\ > > :SF=\E[%dS:SR=\E[%dT:bw:ec=\E[%dX:kb=\177:kd=\EOB:ke=\E[?1l\E>:\ > > :kl=\EOD:kr=\EOC:ks=\E[?1h\E=:ku=\EOA:lm#0:te=\E[r\E[?1049l:\ > > :ti=\E[?1049h:tc=rxvt-mono: > > And I already wondered why it was so short..
It's short because most of the content is in "rxvt-mono" (that "tc=" acts as an include). > > rxvt|rxvt terminal emulator (X Window System):\ > > :pa#64:Co#8:AF=\E[3%dm:AB=\E[4%dm:op=\E[39;49m:tc=rxvt-mono: this also is short - the main difference between the two is that the latter has features for color (pa, Co, AF, AB and op). > > Following the clue from the comment, the example using no color was present > > in rxvt.7 until it was removed in version 9.05 of rxvt-unicode. The current > > documentation contains no examples (the termcap/terminfo are only separate > > files). > > This sounds like a bug in FreeBSD's default termcap. Should I file a PR? yes - -- Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
