On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby <miham...@rktmb.org > wrote:
> In my particular case, I think if I must use NetBSD to virtualize a > FreeBSD, it's cheaper (in time) to stick with Linux and launch a KVM with > FreeBSD inside. > Virtualbox isn't slow when compared against XEN, it's rather the other way around(depending on the nature of VM load). http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/virtualization/1-virtual-machines-performance-comparison.html?start=18 I think you'd find Vbox to be very much on par with KVM although there are a few of the extension features not available when using FreeBSD as the host OS e.g. hi speed usb, not sure if the pci-passthrough works with 4 on FreeBSD. -- Adam Vande More _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
