On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:32:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Polytropon wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
> >> I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.
> >
> > Is there a list that states which CPU should be used with
> > (at least) which CPUTYPE setting?
> 
> /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf

Yes, that is where I got the initial setting of "core2" from.
but it didn't work out of the box. However with the hint of
first omitting CPUTYPE, compiling and installing the system,
then setting it to "core2" and doing the run again, it worked.
Time per compile run was a little bit more than 2 hours, which
is acceptable (compared to more than 7 hours for 7-STABE on
my current system, less cores, but more GHz). :-)

For further system updates per source, there should now be
no more problem with using the correct CPUTYPE setting.

However, I'll have to check why "Giant" is that bad that I
don't get the bktr (Brooktree TV capture card) into the
kernel...



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to